Latest

Biopolitics | World Encyclopedia of Law

Assets

See Also

  • Foregin Policy
  • Overseas Affairs
  • International Relations

Further Reading

  • Adler, E., & Bernstein, S. (2005). Information in energy: The epistemic development of international governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in international governance (pp. 294–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign energy and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford College Press.
  • Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Altheide, D. (2004). Consuming terrorism. Symbolic Interplay, 27(3), 289–308.
  • Amoore, L. (Ed.). (2005). The global resistance reader. Abingdon, U.Okay.: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. (2013). Foucault, power, and schooling. New York: Routledge.
  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Energy in international governance (pp. 1–391). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2005). The facility of liberal international organizations. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in international governance (pp. 161–184). New York: Cambridge College Press.
  • Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. London: Athlone Press.
  • Barry, A, Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1997). Introduction. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political cause: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government (pp. 1–18). London: College of Chicago Press.
  • Berman, J. (2007). The “vital core”: From bare life to biopolitics of human security. In G. Shani, M. Sato, & M. Okay. Pasha (Eds.), Defending human safety in a submit 9/11 world: Essential and international insights (pp. 30–49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bially Mattern, J. (2008). The concept of power and the (un)discipline of worldwide relations. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 691–698). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bleiker, R. (2004). In style dissent, human agency and international politics. Cambridge, U.Okay.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burke, A. (2008). Postmodernism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of worldwide relations (pp. 359–377). New York: Oxford College Press.
  • Calkivik, A. (2010). Why not to decide on a safe “we” in a security-obsessed world. Worldwide Political Sociology, 4(2), 207–209.
  • Castro-Gómez, S. (2010). Historia de la gubernamentalidad: Razón de estado, liberalismo y neoliberalismo en Michel Foucault. Siglo del, Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores; Universidad Central; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Instituto Pensar.
  • Chandler, D. (2009). Critiquing liberal cosmopolitanism? The bounds of the biopolitical strategy. Worldwide Political Sociology, 3, 53–70.
  • Collier, S. J. (2011). Topologias de poder: A análise de foucault sobre o poverno político para além da “governamentalidade”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 5, 245–284.
  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Past worldwide relations principle. Millennium: Journal of Worldwide Studies, 10(2), 126–155.
  • Crampton, J., & Elden, S. (2007). Area, information and power: Foucault and geography. Aldershot, U.Okay.: Ashgate.
  • Davidson, A. (2011). In reward of counter-conduct. Historical past of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41.
  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in trendy society. London: SAGE.
  • Dean, M. (2007). Governing societies: Political perspectives on home and worldwide rule. Buckingham, U.Okay.: Open College Press.
  • Dying, C. (2010). Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian analytics of protest. Social Movement Studies, 9(three), 235–251.
  • Dying, C. (2014). Can we save the planet? In J. Edkins & M. Zehfuss (Eds.), International politics: A new introduction (pp. 61–84). New York: Routledge.
  • Debrix, F. (2010). We other IR Foucaultians. Worldwide Political Sociology four (Foucault 1978), 197–199.
  • Debrix, F., & Barder, A. D. (2009). Nothing to worry however worry: Governmentality and the biopolitical manufacturing of terror. Worldwide Political Sociology, three(4), 398–413.
  • Deleuze, G. (1997). ¿Qué Es Un Dispositivo? In Michel Foucault: Filósofo. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.
  • Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2001). International liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and struggle. Millennium: Journal of International Research, 30(1), 41–66.
  • Di Muzio, T. (2008). Governing international slums: The biopolitics of goal 11. International Governance, 14(3), 305–326.
  • Djaballah, M. (2013). Foucault on Kant, Enlightenment, and being essential. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 264–281). London: Blackwell.
  • Edkins, J. (2000). Whose starvation? Ideas of famine, practices of assist. Minneapolis: College of Minnesota Press.
  • Edkins, J. (2014). Why can we obey? In J. Edkins & M. Zehfuss (Eds.), International politics: A new introduction (pp. 132–153). New York: Routledge.
  • Ewald, F. (1990). Norms, discipline, and the regulation [Special issue]. Representations, 30, 138–161.
  • Forst, R. (2007). “To tolerate means to insult”: Toleration, recognition, and emancipation. In B. Van den Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and energy: Axel Onneth and the custom of crucial social concept (pp. 215–237). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1978). The historical past of sexuality. Quantity I: An introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The topic and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–264). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The delivery of the prison. New York: Classic Books.
  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society have to be defended: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador.
  • Foucault, M. (2007). Safety, territory, inhabitants: Lectures on the Collège De France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke, U.Okay.: Macmillan.
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The start of biopolitics: Lectures on the Collège De France, 1978–79. New York: Macmillan.
  • Frey, F. (1971). Remark: On issues and nonissues within the research of power. American Political Science Evaluation, 65, 1081–1101.
  • Grove, Okay. J. (2010). Insuring “our common future?” Harmful local weather change and the biopolitics of environmental security. Geopolitics, 15(3), 536–563.
  • Guattari, F., & Rolnik, S. (2006). Micropolítica: Cartografías Del Deseo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón.
  • Ham, P. V. (2010). Social power in worldwide politics. Abingdon, U.Okay.: Routledge.
  • Hannah, M. G. (2011). Biopower, life and left politics. Antipode, 43(four), 1034–1055.
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: Conflict and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.
  • Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan. New York: Penguin.
  • Hobbes, T. (1998). On the citizen. Cambridge, U.Okay.: Cambridge College Press.
  • Hobbes, T. (1999). The elements of regulation, pure and politic: Part I, human nature, half II, de corpore politico; with three lives. Oxford: Oxford College Press.
  • Jabri, V. (2007). Michel Foucault’s analytics of conflict: The social, the worldwide, and the racial. Worldwide Political Sociology, 1, 67–81.
  • Jaeger, H.-M. (2007). “Global civil society” and the political depoliticization of international governance. Worldwide Political Sociology, 1, 257–277.
  • Joseph, J. (2010a). The bounds of governmentality: Social concept and the international. European Journal of International Relations, 16, 223–246.
  • Joseph, J. (2010b). What can governmentality do for IR? Worldwide Political Sociology, four, 202–205.
  • Knight, G., & Smith, J. (2008). The worldwide compact and its critics: Activism, power relations, and company social duty. In J. Leatherman (Ed.), Discipline and punishment in international politics: Illusions of control (pp. 191–214). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, G. (1986). Worldwide organization: A state of the artwork on an art of the state. Worldwide Group, 40(four), 753–775.
  • Leatherman, J. (2008). Challenges to authority in international politics. In J. Leatherman (Ed.), Discipline and punishment in international politics: Illusions of control (pp. 1–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Legg, S. (2005). Foucault’s population geographies: Classifications, biopolitics and governmental areas. Population, Area and Place, 11(3), 137–156.
  • Lipschutz, R. D. (2005). International civil society and international governmentality: Or, the search for politics and the state amidst the capillaries of social energy. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in international governance (pp. 229–248). New York: Cambridge College Press.
  • Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2007). Biopolitics of specialised danger: An evaluation of kidnap and ransom insurance coverage. Safety Dialogue, 38(three), 315–334.
  • Löwenheim, O. (2008). Analyzing the state: A Foucauldian perspective on worldwide “governance indicators”. Third World Quarterly, 29(2), 255–274.
  • Martinez, J. (2010). La universidad productora de productores: Entre biopolítica Y subjetividad. Bogota, Colombia: Universidad de La Salle.
  • Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics amongst nations: The wrestle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
  • Nadesan, M. H. (2008). Governmentality, biopower, and on a regular basis life. Routledge studies in social and political thought. New York: Routledge.
  • Nally, D. (2011). The Biopolitics of Food Provisioning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(1), 37–53.
  • Neumann, I., & Sending, J. (2010). Governing the worldwide polity: Apply, mentality, rationality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Oksala, J. (2013). From biopower to governmentality. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 320–336). London: Blackwell.
  • Pasha, M. Okay. (2010). Disciplining Foucault. Worldwide Political Sociology, four, 213–215.
  • Prozorov, S. (2007). Foucault, freedom and sovereignty‎. Cornwall, U.Okay.: Ashgate.
  • Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower immediately. BioSocieties, 1, 195–217.
  • Richmond, O. P. (2010). Foucault and the paradox of peace-as-governance versus on a regular basis agency. Worldwide Political Sociology, four(2), 199–202.
  • Rupert, M. (2005). Class powers and the politics of international governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in international governance (pp. 205–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rygiel, Okay. (2008). Citizenship as authorities: Disciplining populations post-9/11. In J. Leatherman (Ed.), Self-discipline and punishment in international politics: Illusions of control (pp. 85–110). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: 4 chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schmitt, C. (2007). The idea of the political. G. Schwab (Trans.). Chicago: College of Chicago Press.
  • Selby, J. (2007). Partaking Foucault: Discourse, liberal governance and the bounds of Foucauldian IR. Worldwide Relations, 21(3), 324–345.
  • Shaffer, G. (2005). Power, governance, and the WTO: A comparative institutional strategy. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in international governance (pp. 130–160). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shani, G., & Chandler, D. (2010). Assessing the impression of Foucault on worldwide relations. International Political Sociology, four, 196–215.
  • Simons, J. (2013). Energy, resistance, and freedom. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 301–319). London: Blackwell.
  • Sensible, B. (Ed.). (2002). Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge.
  • Spike, P. (2014). How is the world organized economically? In J. Edkins & M. Zehfuss (Eds.), International politics: A new introduction (pp. 363–384). New York: Routledge.
  • Thomas, O. (2014). Foucaultian dispositifs as methodology: The case of nameless exclusions by unique identification in India. Worldwide Political Sociology, eight(2), 164–181.
  • Vrasti, W. (2013). Common but not really “global”: Governmentality, financial liberalism, and the worldwide. Evaluate of Worldwide Research, 39, 49–69.
  • Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: Important encounters. Abingdon, U.Okay.: Routledge.
  • Waltz, Okay. N. (1979). Concept of international politics. Studying, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Weidner, J. R. (2009). Governmentality, capitalism, and subjectivity. International Society, 23(four), 387–411.
  • Zanotti, L. (2013). Governmentality, ontology, methodology: Re-thinking political company within the international world. Options: International, Native, Political, 38(4), 288–304.

  • Law is our Passion

    This entry about Biopolitics has been revealed beneath the terms of the Artistic Commons Attribution 3.zero (CC BY three.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and copy, offered the writer or authors of the Biopolitics entry and the Encyclopedia of Law are in every case credited as the supply of the Biopolitics entry. Please word this CC BY licence applies to some textual content material of Biopolitics, and that some pictures and other textual or non-textual parts may be coated by particular copyright arrangements. For steerage on citing Biopolitics (giving attribution as required by the CC BY licence), please see under our suggestion of “Cite this Entry”.

    Cite this entry

    Legal Citations Generator

    (2018, 11). Biopolitics lawin.org Retrieved 05, 2019, from https://lawin.org/biopolitics/

    “Biopolitics” lawin.org. 11 2018. 05 2019

    “Biopolitics” lawin.org. lawin.org, 11 2018. Net. 05 2019.

    “Biopolitics” lawin.org. 11, 2018. Accesed 05 2019. https://lawin.org/biopolitics/

    international, ‘Biopolitics’ (lawin.org 2018) accesed 2019 Might 25

    Utilization Metrics

    153 Views. 114 Visitors.

    Google Scholar: Search for Biopolitics Related Content material

    Schema Summary

    • Article Identify:
      Biopolitics

    • Writer:
      international

    • Description:
      ContentsBiopoliticsResourcesSee AlsoFurther Reading Biopolitics Assets See Additionally Foregin Coverage Overseas Affairs […]

    This entry was last up to date: February 21, 2018

    About international

    The Encyclopedia of Law was created to be a central, one-stop useful resource for every part associated to regulation. Our main aim is to offer a gentle stream of current, informative, and credible details about regulation and related fields to reinforce the skilled and artistic lives of legal practitioners and people exploring regulation, together with most of the people. Our content material is driven and created by a powerful roster of skilled professionals who work in all areas of the regulation and canopy the sector from numerous angles and views.

    More about Worldwide Relations

  • Evolution of Worldwide Organizations
  • Internalization of Worldwide Law
  • International Knowledge Collection
  • Compliance with International Law
  • Historic Capitals of the World
  • Current Comments

    • 1 – I’ve an unique 1891 guide. My guide’s cowl has the title “A DIctionary Of Law- Black,” which matches the title page. It additionally has “R 340 B” on the duvet. Those I have seen of the same, on the web, has a canopy that states “Black’s Law DIcti…
    • 2 – The method a establishing World Trade Courtroom, having jurisdiction over preferential commerce agreements beyond WTO regulation, will take time. But we’ve discovered to be calm, patient, but persistent. We should always rigorously observe, to build stone upon stone, to r…
    • 3 – The WTO group ought to determine and search its comparative advantage in regulating worldwide commerce. Eradicating tariffs and ad- dressing regulatory, behind the border issues, call for a differing types and modes of negotiations. I consider this. T…
    • 4 – Negotiations on the Transpacific Trade Partnership amongst eleven American and Asian nations (including Japan) and on the Transatlantic Commerce and Funding Partnership between america and the European Union are more likely to produce new and co…
    • 5 – Over time, governments of most nations will subsequently understand that negotiating behind the border issues in proliferating preferential commerce agreements isn’t probably the most suitable avenues to deal with behind the border, regulatory issues. I consider this….

    This entry of the legal Encyclopedia was posted in International regulation and revealed on International Relations on June four, 2018 by worldwide You’ll be able to comply with any added content to this entry by way of the RSS feed. You might skip to the top and increase the entry. You will take 3 minutes and 54 seconds to read this entry.